TONG UPHEAVEL

By Laura Hansen at 10:20 am on March 30, 2008 | No comments

David Chang’s Tongs Takedown

By Josh Friedland at www.thefoodsection.com

Last week’s New Yorker featured a profile of culinary it-boy David Chang and his trio of restaurants, Momofuku Noodle Bar, Momofuku Ssäm Bar, and (brand new) Momofuku Ko. A lot of attention has been paid to the article’s discussion of Chang’s pefectionism, neuroses, and stress in dealing with the incredible amount of praise he has received. Others have obsessed over passages hinting at the possibility of a palatial Momofuku outlet opening in Vegas or even Dubai.

But, it was another passage that I found even more intriguing. It recalls an outburst by Chang when he discovered some shoddy technique by his cooks at the Noodle Bar:

At Noodle Bar, a junior line cook had been cooking chicken for family meal- lunch for the sta?-and although he had to cook something like seventy-?ve chicken pieces and the stoves were mostly empty, he’d been cooking them in only two pans, which meant that he was wastiing time he could have spent helping to prep for dinner. Also, he was cooking with tongs, which was bad technique, it ripped the food apart, it was how you cooked at T.G.I. Friday’s-he should have been using a spoon or a spatula. Cooking with tongs showed disrespect for the chicken, disrespect for family meal, and, by extension, disrespect for the entire restaurant.

Disrespect? For using tongs!

tong.jpg

I have no formal training as a chef, but I love using my tongs. When I cook, they’re like an extension of my hands. Of course, I wouldn’t use them to flip a delicate fish filet for fear of tearing it apart, but they seem to do the job perfectly with chicken (at least for me).

So, have I been a disrespectful cook all these years? What do you think, home cooks and pros, tong lovers and haters? Is tong technique acceptable or should it only be reserved for cheesy restaurant chains?

Note:  Tongs are big in my life (my bbq brother has an entire drawer full).  There is no reason to be a tong snob! LH


Filed under: Very Interesting Food Stuff Leave A Comment »

Putting fat on the laugh front burner: Totie Fields

By Laura Hansen at 9:44 am on | No comments

totiefields.jpg

“I’ve been on a diet for two weeks and all I’ve lost is two weeks.” -Totie Fields (1930-78), American comedian

 In my ongoing weird places that I journey to on the internet, I found this quote (actually in Chicago Magazine) from Totie Fields.  WOW – I thought…TOTIE FIELDS.  All of these memories came flooding back about her. 

She was a pioneer in so many ways – there were few female comics back in the day.  Phyllys Diller, Joan Rivers, Carol Burnett.  Totie often appeared on the Ed Sullivan show, Johnny Carson, Merv Griffin - variety shows.  She made fun of being fat.  At that time, being fat was mostly whispered about. 

She passed away in 1978 after a series of health issues.  If you ever get a chance, look her up.  She was one of a kind!


Filed under: Best Dining In The City Leave A Comment »

Charlie Trotter weighs in on Chicago’s Best Hot Dogs

By Laura Hansen at 12:12 pm on March 29, 2008 | No comments

  Note: This is an excerpt from http://www.wsj.com/ about the best hot dogs in America.  I am including the intro and the section about Charlie Trotter’s opinions….LH

From Los Angeles to Boston, a nationwide search for the nation’s best hot dog.

By RAYMOND SOKOLOV
A small boy in a green stadium has a yellow mouth. He has just finished his first ballpark hot dog at a Detroit Tigers game in 1948. He is very happy, but this is only the beginning. In the ensuing decades, he has consumed thousands more hot dogs, grilled and steamed, with or without relish, at funky stands, in backyards on Memorial Day and at a few glamorous restaurants literally putting on the dog.

Most recently, he — or I should say, I, since I am that former boy with the mustard-smeared mouth — crisscrossed America searching for the best hot dog in the land. And now, on the eve of another baseball season, with another frank-filled Memorial Day soon to come, here is my report. There were superb contenders for the hot dog title in Los Angeles, New York, and especially Chicago. But it was in a parking lot in Boston that I found the hot dog in its highest form, the wiener with the wow factor, the frank of franks.

I deployed an admittedly personal set of standards in choosing the country’s outstanding dogs. Basically, I was looking for excellent traditional hot dogs in excellent buns in establishments full of character and local color. I shunned almost all high-end, chef-centered establishments as well as ballparks, because places that have foie gras on the menu and mass-service major-league arenas clash with the true spirit of the great hot dog stand.

True hot dog stands are not chic, nor do they operate as part of a chain. They are one-offs, mom-and-pop spots. And, most important of all, their success stands or falls on their classic hot dogs. Sure, some of my favorite places also served excellent bratwursts or other estimable sausages, but the center of their menus was always a basic hot dog in a bun.

A classic Chicago dog is steamed, not grilled, and served on a poppy-seed bun. Typically, it’s supplied by local company Vienna Beef, founded in the late 19th century by two Hungarian emigrants who served up sausages at the 1893 World’s Columbian Exposition in Chicago.

But if you are going to check out America’s outstanding regional hot dog at its best, you should follow the advice of the city’s regnant chef-epicure, Charlie Trotter.

charlie-portrait.jpg

I was a bit shy about asking him if he had a favorite hot dog place, but without hesitation, he wrote out some names. The top dogs I visited at the chef’s recommendation were The Wiener’s Circle, Hot Doug’s and Gene and Jude’s Red Hots. It may be that I will offend local fans by asserting that all three of them reach about the same, very high level of presenting the Chicago dog described above. In a way, you would be choosing ambiance more than you would be choosing a better or different hot dog if you were to pick one of these places over another.

weinerscircle.jpg

The Wiener’s Circle is the only one right in the center of town, in Lincoln Park, and it adds a citified sizzle to the intimate experience it provides in its small space. Gene and Jude’s is a great-big, friendly place not far from O’Hare airport, with lots of parking and a lack of style that is a style itself.

Hot Doug’s is a small social step up, but not all that far up. (It describes itself as “the sausage superstore and encased meat emporium.”) Its menu stretches its brawny arms out to embrace much more than the canonical Chicago dog. And its fans are so devoted that they will wait in a long, slowly moving queue outside in the rain.

For some of the faithful, the draw of Hot Doug’s may have been a dauntingly hot-spiced sausage called, for no obvious reason, the Keira Knightley. I was more drawn to the duck-fat fries (available Friday and Saturday only; do the ducks work elsewhere Sunday through Thursday?).

Hot Doug’s basic Chicago dog, like the other alpha pooches’ versions of same, was whatever you wanted it to be. The taste was an amalgam of the toppings you picked. The genius of the Chicago hot dog is in the details, but the essence of the Chicago-style dog is that it lets you be the genius. It’s a truly democratic dish in a place where regular guys (and gals) set the tone.

But this is also the fundamental truth about the hot dog. It turns everybody into a gastronome, because the basic materials are so similar. But even in the most degraded situations, you do have to decide whether to add mustard and relish or sauerkraut.

Me, I stick with the mustard, and I like the sweetly astringent effect a papaya drink adds to the mix, at a corner place near my house.

And if you could excuse me now, I have to wipe the mustard off my chin.

• Email me at eatingout@wsj.com.


Filed under: Best Dining In The City Leave A Comment »

LATEST DRAMA’S FROM TOP CHEF CHICAGO

By Laura Hansen at 9:35 am on March 28, 2008 | No comments

rickbayless.jpg A grape shirted Rick Bayless On Top Chef Chicago 

Note:  I am not sure how many of you out there are watching the Top Chef Chicago series, but now I am officially sucked in. Last night’s episode featured Rick Bayless.  I found this run down and feel that SF Eater is doing a good job of recapping all the drama…. 

Write up by: www.sfeater.com  

Following a bit of a local snoozer last week, the entire quartet of San Francisco cheftestants were front and center in yesterday’s episode of Top Chef Chicago. The third episode of the season centered around the theme of street food: the Quickfire Challenge requiring the 14 remaining chefs to make the humble taco suitable for upscale dining (Richard-whose faux hawk is growing by the week-won immunity with his jicama wraps), and then the Elimination Challenge pit a pair of teams against each other in a neighborhood Block Party cookoff. Since the chefs got to divide forces amongst themselves, all four San Francisco chefs-whose camaraderie really came through in this episode-were on the team that opted to eschew fancy food in favor of Americana comfort food, a decision that ultimately proved disastrous. Ted Allen made his first appearance of the season, Padma spilled marshmallows, and Tom was bald. Also, it’s now been about twelve hours since the episode aired, and we still don’t understand one thing: what the hell was Geraldo Rivera doing there?

And now, the highlights from our beloved San Francisco Foursome:

1) During the quickfire taco challenge, Ryan used the adjective “clean” for the 143rd time, and Erik used a variation of “soulful” for the 244th time. Sadly, Ryan’s squash tacos weren’t clean and Erik’s chicken tacos weren’t soulful and both local boys found themselves in the bottom three again.

2) Guest judge and “Mexican cuisine master” Rick Bayless slammed Erik’s tacos as too downscale for the task, to which Erik responded with the quote of the episode: “I don’t think fine dining and Mexican go together, so he can go screw himself.”

3) For the second challenge, the chefs had to go door-to-door and beg for groceries, prompting NYC chef and silly hat-wearer Spike to describe his team’s strategy for procuring said ingredients: “We immediately send Ryan in because he’s a pretty boy and he speaks well, so he’ll just say ‘Hi, I’m tall, dark and handsome.’” Lo and behold, Ryan starred, charming those quaint Middle Americans.

4) Ryan on the tattooed giant’s own door-to-door skills: “We’ll send Erik to the door and he’ll say [in a low growling voice] CAN I HAVE SOME FOOD NOW?”

5) When twitchy Andrew compared the door-to-door fiasco to “running around like New York City rats,” a lightbulb went off in Eater LA’s head.

6) Erik does corn dogs, which he says he’s perfected at Circa, only to have them get very soggy by dinner time. Turns out that maybe, that wasn’t a great advertisement for Circa.

7) Ryan made a Waldorf salad, leading to the best exchange of the episode, between Ryan and an eavesdropping Tom. It roughly went something like this:

Ryan: My grandma used mayonnaise, but I’m using white balsamic.
Tom: But mayonnaise keeps it fresh.
Ryan: [worried, blank stare]

8) Zoi got stuck with making pasta salad, immediately regretting not making a fuss about the group decision, because, as Erik put it, “she got the shit end of the stick.” Tears ensue, but Erik’s defense of her at the judges’ table was the feel-good moment of the ep.

9) Jen’s sliders were the only dish by the SF4 that didn’t come under scrutiny (yes, we’ve hopped on JB Bandwagon). The three cheftestants facing elimination: Erik, Zoi and Ryan. At this point, we started to think San Francisco might lose someone here.

10) Outcome: Zoi bleeps her way to safety and Ryan is way too good of a character to be sent home already, so it’s Erik that is asked to leave the kitchen. And if you’re wondering how his hometown took the news, the answer is: not well.
· Top Chef Chicago: Local Debriefing, Episode Two [~ESF~]
· Top Chef Chicago: Local Debriefing, First Episode [~ESF~]


Filed under: Best Dining In The City Leave A Comment »

UMAMI ME! It’s the 5th taste!

By Laura Hansen at 5:39 pm on March 27, 2008 | No comments

 It’s the m-m-m in meat. It’s part of the pizazz in a pepperoni pizza. It’s what makes people cheer for cheese.

steak1.jpg

It’s umami, and if your reaction is “u-what-ee?” you’ve got plenty of company. But not for long.

Chefs, nutritionists, cookbook authors and food processors are salivating over the merits of umami, the “fifth taste” that is neither salty, sweet, bitter nor sour.

An increasing awareness of the umami quotient in food is giving many who cook, from high-end chefs to home cooks, greater understanding of how adding umami flavors can perk up their culinary creations. Nutritionists see the potential for umami to help people eat better, especially populations such as the elderly whose sense of taste may be impaired. And for food processors, boosting umami levels in their products could mean less reliance on salt, or more-palatable low-sodium products.

“If we can be aware of what it is, we’re going to have better-tasting food all the time,” said David Kasabian, co-author of “The Fifth Taste: Cooking with Umami,” which he says is the first cookbook devoted to the subject.

Umami – pronounced “oo-MA-mee”-comes from a Japanese word meaning “deliciousness.” This somewhat elusive flavor shows up in a wide variety of protein-rich foods. It is the satisfying savor that makes people crave steak. It is the gratifying richness of grated Parmesan cheese. It is the deep, comforting taste of chicken soup.

” ‘Yummy’ is another way of saying it,” said Jacqueline Marcus, a Chicago nutritionist and food consultant. “It’s that salivating, lip-smacking character.”

This savory taste was isolated 100 years ago by Kikunae Ikeda, a Japanese scientist who wanted to figure out what gave dashi, a Japanese seaweed soup, its distinct flavor. He concluded that the umami flavor came from glutamate, an amino acid and protein building block.

Yummy bits

That means protein-rich foods like meat and dairy products tend to be high in umami, especially when the cooking or processing of the foods gives the proteins time to break down into glutamates. Curing, aging, browning and slow-cooking enhance the umami taste of those foods.

Although the concept has been around for a century, the fifth taste has been slow to catch on in America and other Western countries. For starters, there’s the name, a strange-sounding foreign word.

Also, many food experts and scientists long assumed that umami was merely a combination of some of the four established tastes.

In contrast to them, “umami tastes aren’t found as separate tastes,” said University of Miami research scientist Nirupa Chaudhari, a specialist in the biophysics of taste. “Lemons have a very isolated sour taste. Fruit quite often has a very isolated sweet taste. Seawater has an isolated salt taste. So maybe that’s why umami wasn’t as well understood.”

Chaudhari and her colleagues put to rest any lingering doubts about umami’s status as a separate taste in 2000, when they isolated a receptor on taste buds that responds to the amino acids that impart umami flavor.

People are not alone in having a taste for umami. All the mammals studied so far have umami receptors, Chaudhari said. In fact, members of the cat family lack sweet receptors but have very strong sensitivity to umami, perhaps reflecting the fact that they are exclusively meat-eaters.

Chefs are increasingly incorporating umami flavors into their recipes. New York’s Jean-Georges Vongerichten makes a custard with Gruyere, goat and Parmesan cheeses, topped with shaved black truffle. He calls it “an umami bomb.”

And Chicago’s Rick Bayless, chef-owner of Frontera Grill and Topolobampo, recently offered an $85 four-course umami tasting menu at Topolobampo.

Among the items on the menu, which he billed as a “journey through deliciousness,” were a duck salad with grilled onions and shiitake mushrooms, both of which are high in umami, and a grass-fed ribeye steak with a potato-and-cheese accompaniment-and, for good measure, some bacon.

“My favorite umami ingredient,” noted Bayless, who said that the umami dinner was his best-selling tasting menu during the last four weeks. “I think if you’re a food professional and you don’t know about umami, you’re not very aware.”

Bayless, who opened Frontera Grill in 1987, first read about umami in a restaurant trade journal about 10 years ago. As he came across more references to it, he delved more deeply into the subject because it helped explain why certain dishes have an immediate allure for diners.

Universal flavor

“Foods that are high in sugar, or high in acid, or high in bitter tend to be more polarizing,” he said. “Umami is that flavor to which almost everyone is attracted, immediately and forever.”

Food companies have been aware of umami for decades, even if they didn’t know the word. One of the standby additives in processed food is some form of monosodium glutamate, or MSG, a flavor enhancer that is a kind of essence of umami.

But MSG came under a cloud in the 1980s, when it was linked to “Chinese restaurant syndrome,” the headaches, fevers or other reactions that some people claimed were the result of eating food loaded with MSG, which some Chinese restaurants use with abandon.

Since then, rigorous scientific studies have cleared MSG of being the culprit, said Kasabian, the author.

“The conclusion was that MSG is no worse than sugar or salt,” he said, adding that using MSG in moderation is the key. “Eat enough sugar, and you’ll get diabetes. Eat enough salt, and you’ll get high blood pressure.”

Even so, recognizing that consumers remain suspicious of MSG, giant food companies such as Campbell Soup, Nestle and Frito-Lay are experimenting with ways to cut the salt content of food without losing flavor or adding more MSG. That can mean adding umami-rich ingredients such as cheese, mushrooms or anchovy powder, or using newly developed artificial flavors that do not contain MSG.

Marcus, the nutritionist, believes increased umami flavors could counteract the decline in the sense of taste that occurs with aging.

With a duller sense of taste, many older people lose interest in eating, opening the way to malnutrition, dangerous weight loss and vulnerability to disease.

And because umami flavors soften the bitterness of foods, some nutritionists think that a greater understanding of umami could lead to healthier diets for children, who have a heightened sensitivity to bitter flavors, leading to an aversion to many vegetables.

“No food is nutritious unless that food is eaten, and no food is eaten unless it tastes good,” Marcus said. “And umami makes food taste good.”

soswanson@tribune.com


Filed under: Best Dining In The City, Very Interesting Food Stuff Leave A Comment »